TL;DR
- Climate planning finance involves analysing potential risks and opportunities under different climate scenarios to inform your investment decisions.
- Integrating climate risk into planning also ensures compliance with regulations and aligns your investments with long-term financial goals.
- While challenging without the right risk data, supporting tools from specialised firms exist. These allow you to visualise Capital at Risk, adjust capital allocation and optimise your portfolio.
Listen to this Episode
Duration: 17 minutes
In 2024, global climate catastrophe losses reached $417 billion, impacting the performance of the global sustainable finance market, which is valued at $5.87 trillion.
As the market is projected to grow by up to 19.8% between 2025 and 2034, greater attention to how a worsening climate could impact your capital flows within a sustainable finance framework is crucial to ensuring long-term financial resilience.
However, you may face the challenge of understanding the potential risks and opportunities associated with different climate scenarios and adapting investment strategies accordingly through risk-adjusted capital planning.
This article explores the intersection of climate risk, capital allocation, and financial system adaptation.
Why Capital Must Follow Climate Risk
Have your capital flows ever been disrupted by physical climate risk? Your natural response might be to reassess your investment strategy.
As an investor, you may wonder how physical climate risks can impact your capital invested in a sustainable finance framework.
Climate-related disasters, such as hurricanes and wildfires, can affect the value of your investments through supply chain disruptions, infrastructure damage, or changing regulatory environments.
Capital losses from climate disasters across economic sectors reached $451 billion globally in the last two years alone, underscoring the need for securing your capital through climate-related risk-adjustment planning and a climate-aware capital strategy.
Embracing this approach enables more effective capital allocation to address climate risks. Resilience-focused financial planning is essential to safeguarding your investments in a changing climate.
This matters because:
- Climate-related risks can have a significant impact on your investment returns.
- Failing to account for climate risk can lead to significant losses.
- Finding opportunities in risk, integrating climate data into your capital strategy can help you identify growth paths and minimise potential losses.
- Overall, a risk-adjusted planning approach can help you make informed decisions about capital allocation and climate risk, ensuring that your investments align with your values and financial goals.
Mapping Climate Capital Flows Across Risk Scenarios
You may be wondering why you need to track risk scenarios influencing your capital allocation.
Understanding the potential risks and opportunities associated with different climate scenarios is crucial for making informed investment decisions.
For instance, the Bank of England's (BoE) 2021 Climate Biennial Exploratory Scenario exercise revealed that UK-regulated banks could lose over £50 billion under a severe physical climate risk scenario, putting 40% of mortgage portfolios at risk of counterfactual losses.
As the BoE acknowledged, there is still room for improvement in future exercises. Climate X CEO and co-founder Lukky Ahmed argues that "banks are looking for ways to internalise climate signals into credit risk frameworks. That’s not an easy retrofit".
He further explains that "the way climate scenarios are interpreted in finance is fundamentally flawed. We see banks plugging them into spreadsheets without understanding the assumptions or limitations".
Integrating scenario-based capital planning and climate scenario modelling for finance into your decision-making processes is key to enhancing the resilience of your capital allocation climate risk strategies.
When mapping your capital flows, consider exploring:
- The potential impact of physical climate risks on your investments, including supply chain disruptions and infrastructure damage.
- The opportunities and risks associated with different climate scenarios.
- The need for scenario-based capital planning to inform your climate change capital strategy.
- The importance of integrating climate risk into your risk-adjusted planning approach.
The way climate scenarios are interpreted in finance is fundamentally flawed. We see banks plugging them into spreadsheets without understanding the assumptions or limitations."
Lukky Ahmed, CEO of Climate X
Watch the Webinar: How to Scale Sustainable Finance
Physical Risk & Sector-Level Allocation
As an investor, you need to consider the physical risks associated with your investments, including the potential impact of climate-related disasters on your sector-level allocation.
Climate-related risks can affect different sectors in various ways, from infrastructure to insurance.
More importantly, identifying physical climate risks at the asset level can give you a clearer picture of the most vulnerable sectors where your investments are located.
This can enable you to re-evaluate sectors where your green investments could make positive impacts and yield long-term returns.
A 2024 study has highlighted the importance of assessing physical climate risk at both the asset and sector levels.
The findings suggest that while asset-level evaluations are essential for climate adaptation finance, sector-level vulnerabilities can have a significant impact on companies' business operations, which, in turn, affect the injected capital.
Moreover, the study reveals that investor losses can be severely underestimated by as much as 70% when asset-level data is overlooked, and by 82% when extreme tail risks are ignored.
This analysis should be embedded within a sustainable finance framework to ensure a comprehensive approach to capital allocation and climate risk.
Risk-adjusted sector allocation strategies are key to optimising investments while factoring in climate risks, contributing to financial system adaptation for long-term resilience.
When considering the impact of physical risks on sector-level allocation, think about:
- The opportunities and risks associated with different sectors, including those that are most and least resilient to climate change.
- The need for asset- and sector-level analyses to inform your climate capital strategy.
- The importance of integrating physical risks into your risk-adjusted planning approach.
Visualising Capital at Risk in Sustainable Finance Framework
Still not confident that your investments are resilient enough to the growing threats of climate-related risks? If not, you are not alone.
Many investors and asset managers are continuing to explore the best ways to build resilience and improve the performance of their green capital.
Visualising Capital at Risk (CaR), which is one way to do so, can help you better understand the potential implications of climate change on your investments.
Additionally, this approach can support your decision-making process on capital allocation and climate risk.
Visualising Capital at Risk involves:
- Risk mapping – Creating detailed maps to visualise and quantify risks, identifying high-risk areas and prioritising adaptation strategies.
- Quantitative analysis – Assigning numerical values to risks, assessing potential financial impact using financial models and calculating potential monetary losses.
- Qualitative analysis – Evaluating non-financial factors such as customer trust or regulatory compliance to gain a comprehensive understanding of the far-reaching consequences of risk.
- Scenario analysis – Developing hypothetical scenarios to assess potential risk outcomes and identify critical risks. An example is the NGFS scenarios set (version 5), which adds new features such as the latest trends in renewable energy technologies and key mitigation technologies.
- Risk metrics and indicators – Using metrics like Value at Risk (VaR) and Key Risk Indicators (KRIs) to quantify maximum potential losses and detect early warning signals.
Tools for Dynamic Planning & Reallocation
You need to be able to adapt to changing climate-related risks and opportunities.
Dynamic planning and reallocation tools within a sustainable finance framework enable you to make more informed decisions about capital allocation in response to climate risk.
Ahmed claims: "Tools that combine physical risk with financial exposure will be game-changers. But they have to be explainable - you can’t just throw a black box at a risk committee".
Such tools can facilitate a smooth transition between capturing relevant risks and highlighting the best strategy to secure your capital expenditure while maximising your returns.
Climate X's products introduce you to:
- Unified Risk Management – Streamline your risk assessment and management processes with our integrated, enterprise-wide solutions. This is a cost-effective approach that saves you time and resources.
- Rapid Insights – Our solutions reduce friction in data input, deployment, and analysis, allowing your team to focus on high-priority investment strategies.
- Transparent and Granular Modelling – With access to over 80 data points in your asset risk analysis, you will receive a detailed breakdown to inform your decision-making and enhance business confidence.
Navigating climate risk in sustainable finance is complex, but solutions exist.
Tools like Climate X's Spectra and Adapt offer a unique and comprehensive approach to understanding and managing climate risk.
This enables you and other investors to visualise Capital at Risk, identify growth opportunities, and minimise potential losses.
As the global sustainable finance market grows, making climate risk management a priority is essential. If you embrace this approach proactively, you can drive long-term financial resilience successfully. To learn more about a sustainable finance framework, watch our free webinar.
Watch the Webinar: How to Scale Sustainable Finance
Our Latest Sustainable Finance Articles
A selection of some of our latest articles covering industry, policy and climate science - written by us.
